(Here I remind readers that I’ve been unable to leave comments on blogs since the pandemic started. I don’t know why my phone doesn’t want to let me, and even when I checked in with my notebook recently I couldn’t. Don’t know what that’s all about.)
Anyway, the group likes to lead discussion with a question, and this month’s is:
Have you ever written something that became a form (a poem, short story, novel) or genre that you hadn’t intended on? Or do you choose that in advance (and stick to it)?
The second novel I tackled writing turned out very differently than I expected. The first one, written under the auspices of NaNoWriMo, was something I had switched to on the day I started writing it. The idea of NaNoWriMo is that all the work, and all 50,000 words of it, is done in November (that’s the “mo” or “month” at the end the funny title). I think some people plot out in advance but still do the writing itself during the month. In 2004 I tackled NaNo for the first time, and for the next two years continued the story (each with a new timeframe and other considerations, but technically I cheated the second two times by having something preexisting). On November 1 I thought I was going to be writing one thing, but switched to a different idea just as I sat down to write (or earlier in the day; I can remember some thoughts as they were occurring that month, but not all of them!).
When I sat down to tackle the second book, I had a very specific idea of what I wanted to write...but I had done next to none outlining. It was very vague. So as I began writing, my necessary improvisations changed the book substantially. It was no longer anything like what I had imagined. I mean, there were the elements, but the end result...basically helped me learn what it might look like for me to write a wholly original story of my own. To that point the bulk of my fictional output was Star Trek fan fiction (but even that was always fairly recognizably unusual), and then of course what I produced over the course of those three NaNos, but even then I had been borrowing from a familiar playbook.
The results, to my mind, were very interesting. Other people did not necessarily agree. But the experience has continued to inform my literary career. What can I say? It’s important to know what’s important to you as a writer. If you only write what anyone could write, it’s not really critical for you to have written it, unless you’re a writer who’s okay with that, and many are, but I am not. So this was a crucial learning experience for me, and directly informed the novel I wrote next, which was considerably more focused for it.
And then I had a better idea how to do this sort of thing. And am gearing up to do it all over again.
Sounds like it was a good experiment.
ReplyDeleteWelcome back to the IWSG! Glad to hear you are entering the contest. I'm glad we are back to science fiction again, which was the first one's genre.
I had kind of forgotten that the IWSG even existed. I had followed it for a while. Your last paragraph contains much to think about it. I used to be signed up with NaNoWriMo a few years ago, but the one year they seemed to feel like it was okay to make it a political soapbox so I left and never went back. The discipline of it would probably do me good, though.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI've never taken NaNoWriMo seriously but I suppose it helps some people.
ReplyDelete